Focus 02 — Reference Architecture for Regulated AI

How do we get the speed of LLMs without the E&O exposure of probabilistic decisions?


The technical wedge

The core technical problem in insurance AI is separating probabilistic understanding (LLMs reading documents, classifying intent) from deterministic action (coverage triggers, eligibility, pricing). Standing up a reference architecture — Intake · Understanding · Decision · Action · Truth · Guardrail — with auditable rules engines is what makes AI deployable in a regulated, E&O-exposed environment.

This is the sharpest differentiator versus generalist CAIO candidates: most ship demos that work in the happy path. The hard part is documenting why a coverage decision happened, in a form a department of insurance, a plaintiff’s lawyer, or an internal MRM committee can audit.

What I’ve shipped

What’s coming next

Quarter Deliverable
Q2 2026 Open-source reference implementation skeleton (Python + TS)
Q3 2026 Cornerstone whitepaper: A Reference Architecture for Regulated AI in P&C Insurance
Q3 2026 2 MCP servers accepted to Anthropic directory
Q4 2026 ACORD Connect 2026 talk · Public GIA sandbox
2027 Power of 15 → Insurance AI Coding Standard extension paper

Market signal I track

Anthropic, OpenAI, Google insurance case studies and partnerships · Federato, Akur8, Coalition, Sixfold, Indico, Tractable, Lemonade engineering blogs · NAIC AI Model Bulletin adoption · NIST AI RMF Insurance Profile · ICAIF, NeurIPS Workshop on AI in Finance · LangChain / LlamaIndex insurance integrations.

Success metrics


For more details see LinkedIn GitHub